ITPro Today logo
SQL ServerThe effect of optimize for adhoc workloads–is this right?The effect of optimize for adhoc workloads–is this right?
Question: I recently read Kimberly’s post on USECOUNT=1 plans, and your related article Should I Optimize My SQL Server Instances for Ad Hoc Workloads in the March 2011 issue of SQL Server Magazine. I turned on the “optimize for ad hoc workloads” on one of our production servers this past Sunday and was surprised at the result. The number of single-use plans in cache went from 46k to 58k and the amount of memory stayed the same but the percentage of memory that was my “single-use plan cache” we
Sign up for the ITPro Today newsletter
Stay on top of the IT universe with commentary, news analysis, how-to's, and tips delivered to your inbox daily.