The Windows Media Player 10 Beta--Worth a Look?
The WMP 10 beta is less than ideal, but it still contains new features you might want to examine. Also, readers report a handy way to identify a URL.
July 7, 2004
As usual, when Microsoft releases new beta software, I start receiving email from readers about using it. Before we delve into this software release, let me reiterate my usual caveat about beta software:
Don't install beta software on production computers or on any system that you're not ready and willing to completely restore to the point where you installed the beta software.
This time around, the software is Windows Media Player (WMP) 10, and it's available as a technical beta from http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowsmedia/mp10/default.aspx. By technical beta, Microsoft means that it's an unsupported software release that the company wants to get feedback about. The software has known problems that Microsoft will resolve in a future release, but Microsoft provides no guarantee that you'll be able to simply upgrade this release to the final release version. To obtain support and provide feedback, use Microsoft's online support and feedback forum for the beta at http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowsmedia/mp10/communityandsupport.aspx.
There aren't a lot of compelling reasons to rush right out and try out the WMP 10 beta, although it does contain many new features that are worth examining. WMP 10 provides a framework for some interesting content-purchasing applications--designed, one would think, to compete with the iTunes services. Synchronization with media devices is now integrated into WMP 10, but because few people are likely to be using multiple different devices, this integration doesn't seem to be much of an improvement over devices that worked with WMP 9. I currently use a Dell Digital Jukebox (DJ) 20, and when I tried out the WMP 10 beta I saw no real improvement in the way the DJ 20 handles files, although the DJ 20 is featured prominently in the WMP 10 promotional material. As with earlier versions of WMP, users who want to view DVDs or rip MP3 files will need add-on products to support such capabilities in WMP 10.
In my case, I've been looking for improved performance in scanning for music and manipulating large collections (more than 20,000 tracks) of media files. The WMP 10 beta seems to offer few improvements in these areas, although I don't expect such improvements to be in the product until WMP 10 is released (functionality first, then performance).
My impression of WMP 10 is that Microsoft wants it to be the central console for your digital media experience: recorded music, TV shows recorded by Windows Media Center Edition 2004, DVD playback, pictures from your digital camera--all to be found and managed from the WMP 10 console. Although the playback experience isn't bad, I still find managing a large amount of content through the WMP interface to be a less-than-ideal experience; it still takes a long time to load the library, for example, even with a gigabyte of RAM. For someone who doesn't have thousands of files of every type supported by WMP, it might not be a bad tool. However, given the amount of digital content even the average user is starting to acquire, it will be quite a while before any single tool can adequately serve the needs of most users.
Identifying URLs Revisited
On a different topic, I received plenty of reader feedback on my column "Commentary: On the Net, Awareness = Safety," Windows Client Perspectives, June 24, 2004 (http://www.winnetmag.com/articles/index.cfm?articleid=43067), about tricks for safely browsing the Web. Many readers wrote back with the following tip: Save the URL for any Web page and give it a name, such as "Check Web Address." On the Favorites menu, right-click the URL name and select Properties. Then take the following snip of JavaScript:
javascript:alert("Actual URL address: " + location.protocol + "//" + location.hostname + "/");
and insert it as the actual URL. By clicking the saved favorite, you can check the actual URL of any page you're currently on. Thanks to the half-dozen readers who made this suggestion.
About the Author
You May Also Like