Windows Server 2003 Editions Compared
Sure, Microsoft has its own table comparing the various Windows Server 2003 editions, but that version is incomplete, hard to read, and poorly organized, especially if you're interested in the features that are specific to the 64-bit editions of this product family. So here is my own comparative table, which I think you'll find to be much more readable.
April 7, 2003
Sure, Microsoft has its own table comparing the various Windows Server 2003 editions, but that versionis incomplete, hard to read, and poorly organized, especially if you're interested in the featuresthat are specific to the 64-bit editions of this product family. So here is my own comparative table, which I think you'll find to be much more readable.
NOTE: The response to this table has been incredible! Thanks to everyone who's written in with ideas, corrections, and support. --Paul
Comparing the Windows Server 2003 Editions
Processor support
Feature | Web | Std | Ent | DC |
---|---|---|---|---|
Compatible with 32-bit Intel x86 systems | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Compatible with 64-bit Itanium-based systems | Yes | Yes | ||
Maximum number of processors | 2 | 4 | 8 | 32 |
Hardware support | ||||
Feature | Web | Std | Ent | DC |
Maximum amount of RAM | 2 GB | 4 GB | 32 GB | 64 GB |
Hot-add memory support | Yes | Yes | ||
Non-Uniform Memory Access (NUMA) support | Yes | Yes | Yes |