Converged Infrastructure’s Success Driving Interest in Hyper-converged Systems

Companies need to decide what's best for them. Hyper-converged systems are software-defined and may be better suited for organizations looking to meet a very specific workload need. However, converged architecture costs can be lower than hyper-converged costs because of the software associated with the latter.

Deb Donston-Miller

May 26, 2016

2 Min Read
Converged Infrastructure’s Success Driving Interest in Hyper-converged Systems

More and more companies are gaining significant returns on investment from converged infrastructure, which takes a “building block” approach to networking, compute and storage systems as well as a centralized approach to management. Gartner predicts that hyper-converged infrastructure—which the analyst firm sees as the third wave in integrated systems--will see a huge upswing in adoption in the next five years.

 

“The market for hyper-converged integrated systems (HCIS) will grow 79 percent to reach almost $2 billion in 2016, propelling it toward mainstream use in the next five years,” according to analysts at Gartner. “HCIS will be the fastest-growing segment of the overall market for integrated systems, reaching almost $5 billion, which is 24 percent of the market, by 2019.”

 

There are a number of differences—big and small—between converged architecture and hyper-converged infrastructure.

For example, converged architecture comprises storage, networking, compute and server virtualization hardware, tied together with a centralized management platform. The systems can be delegated as needed. Hyper-converged infrastructure systems may include other elements found in the data center, including backup, compression and optimization systems.

But it’s important to understand that hyper-converged systems are not for everyone. They are software-defined and may be better suited for organizations looking to meet a very specific workload need. However, converged architecture costs can be lower than hyper-converged costs because of the software associated with the latter.

Converged and hyper-converged systems also scale differently. With converged infrastructure, scaling means scaling up: adding more drives, memory or CPUs, or even another reference architecture altogether. With hyper-converged systems you scale out: adding another appliance when the need arises.

Gartner defines three phases of integrated systems:

  • Phase 1-the peak period of blade systems (2005 to 2015)

  • Phase 2- the arrival of converged infrastructures and the advent of HCIS for specific use cases (2010 to 2020)

  • Phase 3-continuous application and micro-services delivery on HCIS platforms (2016 to 2025)

Gartner notes that the progression of HCIS will depend on multiple hardware and software advances, such as networking and software-defined enterprises.

Underwritten by HPE

Part of HPE’s Power of One strategy, HPE Converged Architecture 700 delivers infrastructure as one integrated stack. HPE Converged Architecture 700 delivers proven, repeatable building blocks of infrastructure maintained by one management platform (HPE OneView), built and delivered exclusively by qualified HPE Channel Partners. This methodology saves considerable time and resources, compared to the do-it-yourself (DIY) approach.

Based on a complete HPE stack consisting of HPE BladeSystem with Intel® Xeon® E5 v3-based HPE ProLiant BL460c Gen9 blades, HPE 3PAR StoreServ all-flash storage, HPE Networking, and HPE OneView infrastructure management software, the HPE Converged Architecture 700 can be easily modified to fit within your existing IT environment.

Sign up for the ITPro Today newsletter
Stay on top of the IT universe with commentary, news analysis, how-to's, and tips delivered to your inbox daily.

You May Also Like