Windows & .NET Magazine UPDATE--Commentary: Migrating, Upgrading, and Obsolescing: A Legacy Windows Wrap-Up--February 10, 2004

This Issue Sponsored By

Argent Software
http://www.argent.com/products/download.cgi?product=xxx&Source=WNT

Windows & .NET Magazine
http://www.winnetmag.com/rd.cfm?code=fsep204xup

===============

==== Sponsor: Argent Software ====
Free Download: Monitor Your Entire Infrastructure with ONE Solution
The Argent Guardian monitors servers, applications, any and all SNMP-compliant devices as well as the overall health of the entire network at a fraction of the cost of "framework" solutions. Network Testing Labs states that "The Argent Guardian will cost far less than MOM and yet provide significantly more functionality." Using a patented Agent-Optional architecture, the Argent Guardian is easily installed and monitoring your infrastructure in a matter of hours. Download a fully-functioning copy of the Argent Guardian at:
http://www.argent.com/products/download.cgi?product=xxx&Source=WNT

==========

==== 1. Commentary: Migrating, Upgrading, and Obsolescing: A Legacy Windows Wrap-Up ====
by Paul Thurrott, News Editor, [email protected] In the last two issues of Windows & .NET Magazine UPDATE, I discussed the fates of users still implementing Windows NT Server 4.0 and Windows 98 and what they can expect going forward as Microsoft inevitably retires these two systems. To most tech-savvy individuals, the idea of using an OS that's 6 to 8 years old might seem antiquated. However, the reality of corporate spending during an economic downturn, buying cycles, and the necessity of keeping legacy applications working means that many enterprises and even small and midsized businesses still use these and other, older non-Microsoft systems today and likely will for some time to come. This week, I wrap up this topic, present some feedback from readers, and discuss the relevant parts of the most recent 2003 Windows & .NET Magazine Reader Survey. Both the reader feedback and survey results speak volumes about the pains of moving technology forward in the real world. Like many of you, I'm a technology enthusiast, and I have to temper my desire for new technology for technology's sake with the real-world needs of Return on Investment (ROI) and necessity. With the exception of the short-lived dot-com boom era, there was never a point in modern corporate history when companies implemented technology simply because it was available. Instead, forward-thinking IT decision makers, administrators, and other technology-driven users are regularly forced to sell technologies they want based on sometimes vague cost justifiers. Business- and government-oriented technology purchases (and, generally speaking, educational institution technology purchases) have historically held to a long usage cycle, one that's much longer than Microsoft's OS release cycle. The result is a mismatch of product versions in companies around the world, each with different capabilities, vulnerabilities, and other concerns. This management nightmare gets even worse when you combine it with the inevitable deployment of numerous non-Microsoft technologies, all of which are expected to work together. As noted earlier, Microsoft's response to this situation has changed dramatically over the years from the "Windows everywhere" theme of the mid-1990s to a more realistic theme of interoperability today. But don't give Microsoft too much credit for bowing to market realities: The company is still far more interested in providing migration technologies than interoperability technologies and does little to support older products, beyond suggesting that newer products might be more secure and thus less expensive to operate. However, for most of the people using suddenly orphaned software, upgrading isn't an option. Two weeks ago, I noted that the actual cost of software--that is, the price one pays to license a particular software product--is typically one of the least expensive aspects of a system's overall lifetime cost. But several readers, faced with Microsoft's new licensing schemes, are discovering that this is often no longer true. "I'm in the middle of making a technology plan for a [non-profit organization] and I'm finding that this is increasingly not the case," one reader noted. My suspicion is that we've reached an unprecedented point in the PC price model: Whereas typical PCs cost $1500 or more just a few years ago, today you can purchase full-featured PCs for less than $500. Thus Microsoft's OS (and, potentially, Microsoft Office) licensing fees represent a much greater percentage of the upfront costs of a PC than they did before. I suspect that's one of the many reasons people are starting to evaluate open-source desktop solutions such as Linux and OpenOffice.org in increasing numbers. On a related note, a few readers opined that, by extending the support life cycle of Win98, Microsoft was giving Linux a chance to catch up. Systems that are now running Win98 will be unable to support Windows XP or Longhorn in a year or two, but these Pentium II- and Pentium III-era boxes with small amounts of RAM might make good candidates for desktop Linux installations, further stretching out the cost of the hardware. And let's not forget the application software these legacy desktops are running. Most Win98 desktops are probably running Office 2000 or Office 97, or other, older software packages that are either unsupported now or will be soon. I still believe that Linux and OpenOffice.org training costs and a loss of expected features will be problematic, but with another year or two to improve, who can say? Suddenly migrating a wide range of users to new hardware and software systems can be both expensive and painful. With respect to security, Microsoft correctly notes that only its most recent systems are the most secure, and that aging, nonsupported systems will quickly become liabilities. In my mind, the security concern renders the "it still works" argument for legacy systems somewhat moot, although I should note that I did receive a startling number of email messages that supported the "it still works" argument. "Any migration is painful," one reader correctly noted, especially when your system is still working just fine. And for businesses still working in pre-Active Directory (AD) environments, AD is still daunting. Let's look at some numbers from the September 2003 Windows & .NET Magazine Reader Survey, which is based on feedback from hundreds of responses. Eighty-five percent of respondents--largely IT management and staff--said that they'd already migrated to Windows 2000 Professional Edition on the desktop, compared to 46 percent for XP. On the server side, Win2K Server migrations are unchanged over 6 months at 78 percent, while Windows Server 2003 migrations are at 15 percent, up from 6 percent 6 months earlier. Perhaps more relevant, 83 percent of respondents use Win2K as their server platform, compared to 7 percent for Windows 2003 and 10 percent for NT. But just 63 percent of respondents have rolled out AD, compared with 15 percent currently undergoing migration and 22 percent who have no plans to do so. I expected these figures to be skewed somewhat by the size of the companies that the respondents work at, but that wasn't the case: Workstation and server migration plans and time frames were similar regardless of company size. I know from personal experience that a rift often exists between wanting to write about what's new and needing to support the technologies people actually use. Here in Windows & .NET Magazine UPDATE, I try to walk a line between presenting newer technologies you might not have heard about and tackling the concerns you actually face in your day-to-day jobs. As always, I'm interested in your feedback. The phenomenal responses I received from the previous two editorials were much appreciated, and I apologize for not having the time to respond to everyone personally. Thanks for reading.

==========

==== Sponsor: Windows & .NET Magazine ====
Get 2 Sample Issues of Windows & .NET Magazine!
Every issue of Windows & .NET Magazine includes intelligent, impartial, and independent coverage of security, Active Directory, Exchange Server, and more. Our expert authors deliver content you simply can't find anywhere else. Try two, no-risk sample issues today, and find out why 100,000 IT professionals read Windows & .NET Magazine each month!
http://www.winnetmag.com/rd.cfm?code=fsep204xup

==========

==== 2. Hot Off the Press ====
by Paul Thurrott, [email protected] Disney Adopts Windows Media DRM
Ending days of speculation, entertainment giant The Walt Disney Company announced a multiyear agreement with Microsoft to license Microsoft Windows Media technologies, including the Digital Rights Management (DRM) component that can protect the delivery of digital content. Windows Media technologies are increasingly gaining favor with Hollywood, as content creators seek to find secure ways to expand into new digital markets and Internet content delivery. Disney is the second major Hollywood player to embrace the technology in recent days; Time Warner licensed it last fall. But the combination of Disney and Microsoft represents a melding of two of the most respected brands in America and reestablishes Windows Media as the de facto standard for digital-media delivery. To read this story and more, visit the following URL:
http://www.winnetmag.com/article/articleid/41721/41721.html ==== 3. Networking Perspectives ====
by Alan Sugano, [email protected] Windows 2000 Inaccessible Boot Device, Recovery Console, and Chkdsk
My consulting company received a call from a client company that said its server had received the dreaded "Inaccessible boot device" blue screen. The server was a Compaq ML350 with a 1GHz processor, 2GB of memory, and duplexed 36GB hard disks. The server was running Windows 2000 with Service Pack 4 (SP4) and Microsoft Exchange 2000 Server with SP3. Network administrators noticed that the server was running slowly and decided to reboot it. When they restarted the server, they saw the "Inaccessible boot device" error message.
When we arrived on site, we attempted to restart the server. The server would display the Win2K splash screen, but after 2 minutes, the machine would display a blue screen and the error message. At start-up, the primary mirror displayed a message that hard disk failure was imminent. At this point, the problem looked like a bad primary mirror hard disk. Read the complete story about how we fixed this client's disk failure problems at the following URL:
http://www.winnetmag.com/article/articleid/41738/41738.html ==== 4. Announcements ====
(from Windows & .NET Magazine and its partners) Try a Sample Issue of Security Administrator!
Security Administrator is the monthly newsletter from Windows & .NET Magazine that shows you how to protect your network from external intruders and control access for internal users. Sign up now to get a 1-month trial issue--you'll feel more secure just knowing you did. Click here!
http://www.secadministrator.com/rd.cfm?code=fsep254xup Check Out 2 Free Web Seminars--Selecting the Right IM Security Solution and Streamlining User Provisioning and Password Management
Gain control over your IM security by learning about IM authentication, encryption, support for and interoperability between different IM networks, auditing, automatic legal disclaimers, and virus and worm scanning. Or, discover automating provisioning and centralizing password management and how to reduce support costs and security breaches. Register now!
http://www.winnetmag.com/seminars ~~~~ Hot Release: Microsoft(R) Office System ~~~~ Discover Great Moments at Work with Microsoft(R) Office System. Multiple downloads available now from Windows & .NET Magazine's Download Central.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;6986016;8515962;x?http://ad.doubleclick.net/click;h=v2|3365|0|0|%2a|u;6969171;0-0;0;8701546;31-1|1;4171280|4189176|1;;%3fhttp://www.microsoft.com/office/trial/default.mspx ==== 5. Instant Poll ==== Results of Previous Poll: Magazine Content
The voting has closed in Windows & .NET Magazine's nonscientific Instant Poll for the question, "If you subscribe to Windows & .NET Magazine, which article type do you value most?" Here are the results from the 224 votes:
- 6% Strategic technology overviews
- 70% How-to articles
- 0% Product announcements
- 4% Product reviews
- 20% I value all article types equally New Instant Poll: Magazine Back Issues
The next Instant Poll question is, "If you subscribe to Windows & .NET Magazine, how long do you keep your back issues for reference?" Go to the Windows & .NET Magazine home page and submit your vote for a) One month or less, b) More than 1 month, but less than 1 year, c) More than 1 year, but less than 5 years, d) More than 5 years, or e) I never throw them away.
http://www.winnetmag.com/magazine ==== 6. Resources ==== Tip: Why can't I back up the system state on my Windows 2000 Server system?
by John Savill, http://www.windows2000faq.com The system state contains core system elements such as Active Directory (AD); the System Volume (Sysvol); the machine's domain controller (DC) status (i.e., whether the system is a DC); the boot files; the registry; and COM+ configuration information. To back up the system state, the user must have "Back up files and directories" and "Restore files and directories" rights; otherwise, the option to back up the system state might be unavailable in Windows Backup. To grant these rights, perform the following steps:
1. Log on to a DC.
2. Start the Microsoft Management Console (MMC) Domain Security Policy snap-in (go to Start, Programs, Administrative Tools, and click Domain Security Policy).
3. Expand the Security Settings, Local Policies, and User Rights Assignment branches.
4. Double-click the "Back up files and directories" policy.
5. Select the "Define these Policy Settings" check box, then click "Add Users or Group."
6. Click Browse and locate the user you want to add (or a group that the user is in), then click OK.
7. Click OK to return to the main policy dialog box.
8. Repeat Steps 5, 6, and 7 for the "Restore files and directories" policy.
9. After you finish Step 8, close the snap-in and force a refresh of the policies. To refresh the policies, open a command line and type secedit /refreshpolicy machine_policy /enforce
10. Log off and log on. ==== 7. Events Central ====
(A complete Web and live events directory brought to you by Windows & .NET Magazine: http://www.winnetmag.com/events ) New--Microsoft Security Strategies Roadshow!
We've teamed with Microsoft, Avanade, and Network Associates to bring you a full day of training to help you get your organization secure and keep it secure. You'll learn how to implement a patch-management strategy; lock down servers, workstations, and network infrastructure; and implement security policy management. Register now for this free, 20-city tour.
http://www.winnetmag.com/roadshows/computersecurity2004 ==== 8. New and Improved ====
by Carolyn Mader, [email protected] Monitor Network Bandwidth Usage
SoftPerfect Research announced NetWorx 3.1, a network connection bandwidth-management solution that lets you monitor network connections and manage network operations. NetWorx lets you control bandwidth use, inbound and outgoing traffic amounts, and suspicious network activity due to possible virus infection. The application lets you manage connection throughput as well as customize reports and alert modules to make sure you don't have a security breach at the network level. For pricing, contact SoftPerfect Research at [email protected].
http://www.softperfect.com Learn Scripting
Charles River Media announced Jeff Fellinge's "IT Administrator's Top 10 Introductory Scripts for Windows," a book that helps you learn and quickly implement new scripting tools to increase productivity and reduce redundancy. Fellinge takes you through scripting basics by explaining and breaking down real-world examples. The chapters also cover hypothetical, real-world business needs and explain how to map a script-based solution, including a discussion of the preferred language, tools, and technologies. The book costs $49.95. Contact Charles River Media at 800-382-8505.
http://www.charlesriver.com Tell Us About a Hot Product and Get a T-Shirt!
Have you used a product that changed your IT experience by saving you time or easing your daily burden? Tell us about the product, and we'll send you a Windows & .NET Magazine T-shirt if we write about the product in a future Windows & .NET Magazine What's Hot column. Send your product suggestions with information about how the product has helped you to [email protected]. ==== Sponsored Links ==== Argent
Comparison Paper: The Argent Guardian Easily Beats Out MOM
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;6480843;8214395;q?http://www.argent.com/products/download_whitepaper.cgi?product=mom&&Source=WNTTextLink Javelina Software
Check out ADvantage to bulk modify Active Directory attributes.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;7115967;8214395;t?http://www.javelinasoftware.com/winnetmag2.html

==========

==== 9. Contact Us ==== About the newsletter -- [email protected] About technical questions -- http://www.winnetmag.com/forums About product news -- [email protected] About your subscription -- [email protected] About sponsoring UPDATE -- [email protected]

===============

This email newsletter is brought to you by Windows & .NET Magazine, the leading publication for IT professionals deploying Windows and related technologies. Subscribe today.
http://www.winnetmag.com/sub.cfm?code=wswi201x1z

Manage Your Account
You are subscribed as #EmailAddr#.

You received this email message because you requested to receive additional information about products and services from the Windows & .NET Magazine Network. To unsubscribe, send an email message to mailto:[email protected]. Thank you!

View the Windows & .NET Magazine Privacy policy at
http://www.winnetmag.com/aboutus/index.cfm?action=privacy Windows & .NET Magazine a division of Penton Media, Inc. 221 East 29th Street, Loveland, CO 80538, Attention: Customer Service Department Copyright 2004, Penton Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.