Windows Vista usage share surges 355 percent, leaves Mac OS X in the dust
PC World: Apple fans have made much of the fact that the newest figures from Net Applications show that Apple's share of the operating system market has jumped almost 32% in the past year. But they're ignoring a simple fact: Vista's market share during that same time leaped more than 355%. When you add in other Windows versions, Microsoft owns more than 90% of the market. Net Applications reports that the Mac had 7.94% market share in June, up from 6.03% a year ago. Going from a little more than 6% to just under 8% may be a big gain when measured as a percentage of growth. But when seen in absolute numbers, it's not particularly impressive. Vista, by way of contrast, showed far more explosive growth. In June, 2007, it had 4.54% market share. In June, 2008, it had reached 16.14% --- more than a 355% gain. Those numbers are substantial not just in percentage terms, but in raw terms as well. Apple would sell the first-born children of most of its employees if it could ever get to a 16% market share. This is a great bit of info because, as noted, Mac fanatics do in fact love to point to these not-really-market-share numbers as "proof" of the huge gains the Mac is making in the PC market. Take that, iCabal. Anyway, I've been making this kind of argument for a long time and demonstrated some time ago on the Nexus blog that making huge market share increases is easy when you almost zero market share. And let's be clear: Net Applications does not measure market share. They measure usage share, and only on the Web. There's a big difference between the two and they're not interchangeable. (That is, the actual real-world usage share for Windows is higher than these numbers suggest. There are over a billion people using Windows, for crying out loud.) Thanks Marc. And speaking of myth-busting, did I ever tell you about the joke were iCabal high-priest Walter Mossberg actually busted the myth that Macs are somehow used over a longer period of time than Windows
July 14, 2008
Apple fans have made much of the fact that the newest figures from Net Applications show that Apple's share of the operating system market has jumped almost 32% in the past year. But they're ignoring a simple fact: Vista's market share during that same time leaped more than 355%. When you add in other Windows versions, Microsoft owns more than 90% of the market.
Net Applications reports that the Mac had 7.94% market share in June, up from 6.03% a year ago. Going from a little more than 6% to just under 8% may be a big gain when measured as a percentage of growth. But when seen in absolute numbers, it's not particularly impressive.
Vista, by way of contrast, showed far more explosive growth. In June, 2007, it had 4.54% market share. In June, 2008, it had reached 16.14% --- more than a 355% gain. Those numbers are substantial not just in percentage terms, but in raw terms as well. Apple would sell the first-born children of most of its employees if it could ever get to a 16% market share.
This is a great bit of info because, as noted, Mac fanatics do in fact love to point to these not-really-market-share numbers as "proof" of the huge gains the Mac is making in the PC market. Take that, iCabal.
Anyway, I've been making this kind of argument for a long time and demonstrated some time ago on the Nexus blog that making huge market share increases is easy when you almost zero market share.
And let's be clear: Net Applications does not measure market share. They measure usage share, and only on the Web. There's a big difference between the two and they're not interchangeable. (That is, the actual real-world usage share for Windows is higher than these numbers suggest. There are over a billion people using Windows, for crying out loud.)
Thanks Marc.
And speaking of myth-busting, did I ever tell you about the joke were iCabal high-priest Walter Mossberg actually busted the myth that Macs are somehow used over a longer period of time than Windows PCs? I know, that's funny, right? Well, it really happened.
About the Author
You May Also Like