John Carmack: Apple still needs to get its act together

When id programming guru John Carmack appeared briefly at Steve Jobs' MacWorld keynote address last week, many people took it as a sign that thenew G3 machines had, in fact, surpassed the Pentium II. Otherwise, peopleargued, why would the creator

Paul Thurrott

January 10, 1999

2 Min Read
ITPro Today logo

When id programming guru John Carmack appeared briefly at Steve Jobs' MacWorld keynote address last week, many people took it as a sign that thenew G3 machines had, in fact, surpassed the Pentium II. Otherwise, peopleargued, why would the creator of such best sellers as DOOM, Quake, and Quake II have bothered? Well, it turns out that Carmack isn't as enthusiastic about the Mac as you might think: Apple basically promised toget its act together if id agreed to port their next game--the widely anticipated Quake3: Arena--to the Mac. Id decided to go for it and Carmackshowed up at MacWorld as a favor to Jobs.

"[The first beta], and later the full commercial Quake3: Arena, will be simultaneously released on Windows, Mac, and Linux platforms," Carmack saidin a note to fans this week. "I think Apple is doing a lot of things right.A lot of what they are doing now is catch-up to [Windows], but if they cankeep it up for the next year, they may start making a really significantimpact."

"I still can't give the Mac an enthusiastic recommendation for sophisticatedusers right now," Carmack continued, "because of the operating system issues. [Apple is] working towards correcting that with MacOS X."

Carmack also attacked Apple's bogus speed comparisons with Windows boxes,which the company continues to shell out to the excitable Mac faithful.

"Basically, its a great system, but Apple has oversold its performance relative to Intel systems. In terms of [Quake gaming speed], the new G3 systems should be near the head of the pack, but there will be Intel systems outperforming them to some degree. The Mac has not instantly becomea 'better' platform for games than [Windows], it has just made a giant leapfrom the back of the pack to near the front," he wrote. "I wish Apple wouldstop quoting 'Bytemarks'. I need to actually look at the contents of thatbenchmark and see how it can be so misleading. It is pretty funny listeningto Mac evangelist types try to say that an iMac is faster than a Pentium II400. Nope. Not even close."

"From all of my tests and experiments, the new Mac systems are basically asfast as the latest Pentium II systems for general CPU and memory performance," he continues. "This is plenty good, but it doesn't make theIntel processors look like slugs."

Since we're on the subject--Apple's insane claims have always frustrated meconsidering the number of things they could (and should) crow about--it should be noted that Jobs' claims of $1599-$2999 pricing for the new G3s isalso basically bogus. These prices are achievable for only the most barebones systems. A full-blown 400 MHz G3 runs around $5000, and a typicalmid-range system will set you back about $3600. The point here is just a simple request for truth in advertising: Steve Jobs can get the Apple faithful in such a lather that they'd be believe anything. It's a shame tosee him bend the truth so readily

Read more about:

Apple

About the Author(s)

Paul Thurrott

Paul Thurrott is senior technical analyst for Windows IT Pro. He writes the SuperSite for Windows, a weekly editorial for Windows IT Pro UPDATE, and a daily Windows news and information newsletter called WinInfo Daily UPDATE.

Sign up for the ITPro Today newsletter
Stay on top of the IT universe with commentary, news analysis, how-to's, and tips delivered to your inbox daily.

You May Also Like